Improved or updated driver education in conjunction with the graduated driving license system, will likely help in reduction of numerous tragedies witnessed on the roads presently rather than placing blames on teenage drivers.
With advanced technology in the future, such as a car automatically returning to a track if it is heading in the wrong direction, then maybe we can think of legalizing cell phone usage while driving, since it would not be as much dangerous.
Maximum words Submit The minimum drivers license age should not be raised to 18 because year-olds are more responsible and have a much more focused mind. This criteria used by insurance companies of charging low premiums on teenagers who have good grades is dismissive and misleading.
The weak nature of muscles of most teenagers is another reason as why they should not drive. Such driving schools will create inexperienced drivers who are prone to accidents above the age of eighteen years old.
Being 16 and having an early, fast start to getting your license rather than finally getting it after a long slow process makes a huge difference to your life.
This means that teenagers are also less receptive to traffic rules and highly vulnerable to make wrong decisions on the road. Similarly, just because AIDS is not the only disease that can affect a person does not mean that we should not try to find a cure for it. In most developed countries many grandparents, parents, and An argument against teenagers driving cars in the united states members of the family are likely to buy for a teenage or even a young child a car.
When tired, teenagers usually become drowsy and may need to or begin to sleep while driving. Human brain operates in a manner that will allow an individual to only master some things when they are young. Conversely, they fail to indicate that a very high percentage of adults also cause accidents. When allowed to drive, drunk teenage drivers will obviously involve in fatal accidents.
No of course not! This is a recipe that causes huge number of accidents on the roads. This is the most effective way of ensuring that most teenage drivers become competent. In fact, if such services distract drivers, then they should be banned.
Additionally, young people have better reflexes that are remarkably essential for quick response in case of anything. This means that teenagers will continue processing the information even when driving, a practice that can compromise their concentration on the road and expose them to accidents.
When year-olds graduate from school, they fool themselves into thinking that they know everything. It is a way of disrupting the lives of many teenagers without an appropriate reason. Jake Nelson, director of traffic safety advocacy for the AAA, agreed.
The five states that do not ban all drivers from texting do have certain limits -- such as prohibiting "novice" drivers from textingaccording to the GHSA. Once youth have completed school, would you want them moving into the real world without a license? It is not cheap for the manufacturers, nor for the customers.
Surely, it is the same as saying that we should legalise intoxicants because in the near future, cars will drive on their own, so being intoxicated will cause absolutely no car accidents. Conversely, for teenagers to process complex and numerous messages, they requires a lot of time.
Dopamine sometimes tends to be very strong to surpass ability of teenagers to control their desires. This kind of treatment of teenagers wanting to drive is discriminatory and constitutionally unexpected. Many old people are prone to forgetting their glasses and that makes them vulnerable in the roads while driving.
When alone on the road, distraction may come from road signs, pedestrians or even commercial billboards that can carry away their concentration to forget about the crucial responsibility at hand.
CDC adds that per every mile, teenager drivers in the age bracket between 16 and 19 years are thrice likely to involve in fatal car crash than those above 20 years. So, it is not right for people to subject all the youths to a problem they have not committed.
Raising the age limit will push many people to go to below standard driving schools that are only interested in making money.
Also an year-old who is able to drink alcohol is more likely to drive drunk or try stunts to show off to their friends, which makes them far pose a much greater threat on the road than a still-in-school year-old.
For example, most teenagers do not consider fastening of seat belt as a safety measure when driving in a car. This poses a very serious risk to the teen drivers making them unfit to drive during night or early in the morning.
I conclude that these days, it is best to ban cell phone usage, because that will reduce the amount of accidents. To begin with, insurance companies consider it as a risky undertakes to provide cover for cars driven by the teenagers Schultz, Combined with the general poor ability to respond to impulse, dopamine usually makes teenagers involve in reckless practices like drinking of alcohol and desire to show off their level of knowhow.
It is apparent that many teenagers are usually inexperienced when it comes to driving.Should year-olds drive?
The institute's page report collects research on the minimum driving age from the United States and countries that have higher licensing ages.
Motor vehicle. Explore the pros and cons of the debate Cell phone use while driving should stay legal activity. DEBATES. OPINIONS. FORUMS. it would cost more to repair the car. Also, for the sake of argument, assume that the United States did enforce this law upon manufacturers in their country.
the baby steps in this war against distracted driving. Texting while driving: Does banning it make a difference? whose organization supports laws against texting while driving. it's not only teenagers who text at the wheel, Ferdinand pointed mi-centre.comd: Sep 18, Inmore than 2, teenagers died in the United States from motor vehicle crash injuries.
Such injuries are by far the leading public health problem for young people years old (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety [IIHS], ). Drivers are not the only ones at risk. Teenagers who are. Argument: Mobile Phone and United States Essay; Argument: Mobile Phone and United States Essay.
Each day thousands of teenagers and adults cross the United States reach for their phones and get distracted while driving.
It only takes a minute for a person to open their phone and respond to a text, but it also only takes a minute for his. Raising the driving age from 16 to 18 has been debated by parents and lawmakers in the United States. Arguments against raising the driving age include safety, convenience to parents, no reduction in the chance of teens indulging in risky behavior and damage to the economy.
One of the arguments.Download